Fast Forward: Scientist, AI Expert, Entrepreneur Vivienne Ming

Hi, I'grand Dan Costa, Editor-in-Chief of PCMag.com and this is Fast Frontward where we accept conversations about living in the future. My guest today is Vivienne Ming, a theoretical neuroscientist, technological pioneer, entrepreneur, and the Co-Founder of Socos amongst many, many other things that nosotros will go into. At CES, you gave a presentation. Let's talk nearly that, let's talk about artificial intelligence, and take information technology from there.

Vivienne Ming: Certain, there seems to exist 2 big conversations at CES which is AI and VR and at that place's a lot of reasons for it. My console, which had some big wigs from IBM and Phillips and others, all they're talking almost [are] why and what are the implications. I'll exist blunt, in that location'due south only then much that the head of Watson or the caput of Accenture's engineering science sectionalisation tin can do on a phase besides say hey, this is neat considering …

Dan Costa: They've all got products.

Ming: Exactly. I think they're very honest virtually it, but I retrieve one of the missing ingredients which nosotros endeavor to bring to this panel is what are the big scale implications? Why is anybody so excited? Is information technology real? It is. Should you exist excited? You should, but the changes are probably not tomorrow. Also, these changes have real consequences.

Costa: When we talk well-nigh AI, a lot of people call back Alexa. But when you talk near AI, what do you mean?

Ming: I'thousand an AI snob. In fact, I'm going to become so far [every bit to say], 'we are going to redefine AI,' and we did it on stage. But...these are just vocalization interfaces for database search. There'southward some bully stuff behind the scenes, merely it's automation. It's great automation, I'm non knocking it. AI to me, the near basic and tangible would be the face up recognition and images that Facebook and Google can do. AI is some aspects of self-driving cars. Non everyone, merely a lot of them.

Fast Forward Bug Art In a sense, Andrew Ng who is the Master Scientist at Baidu, put it really well. AI is anything that feels uniquely human, but we can do in maybe in a 2nd to five seconds. Now we can build things often the hot technology right now, deep neural networks, we can build deep neural networks that can do anything you and I tin can practise on that kind of cognitive scale. If I can, for example, look at a resumé and think later on about v seconds 'ah, maybe I won't rent this person.' I can build an AI to do that different and better.

Dan Costa: Yeah, and you've done that.

Ming: Nosotros have. Nosotros've done that work at my previous company, Gild, where I was a Chief Scientist. I am the Chief Science Advisor at a actually absurd company in Chicago called ShiftGig. I advise a lot of companies in the HR space. At that place are some amazing potential technologies in this space and understanding what can be washed.

Over again, retrieve about a circuitous judgment. Practice I know this person? Are they happy, are they sad? Should I hire them? At to the lowest degree those snap judgments. We can really automate that sort of thing nowadays. At that place are some implications virtually that, just that'south what I'thou getting at with AI. What'south interesting is but as hard as it can be for me to tell y'all why I recognize y'all, why I would hire this person, it turns out we needed these deep neural networks that are about just every bit complicated to understand to solve those problems.

Costa: Permit'due south suspension into that 1 example of evaluating someone for a chore. I retrieve it'd be interesting to run across how that works. Does information technology simply scan the resumé and look for keywords? It's a little more sophisticated than that.

Ming: Yes, there are a lot of different approaches you can have and in that location are many different companies that have worked hard on this problem, some internally such as Google. In our case nosotros were focused on what'due south called sourcing, which is to say before someone ever enters your hiring pipeline should I fifty-fifty pay attending to them? The interesting affair, and what does make AI exciting, is that we are able to plough that on its caput. Instead of your sourcers having to actively become out and look for people, we could just transport our AIs out and expect at everybody. And so say to your recruiter, 'these are the 100 people you should consider.' We tin't tell you lot yet who to hire, though people are working on that.

We can narrow this down and say these are the high probability hires for you lot and we brought it to you. That'due south part of what'due south interesting. Not about replacing what people tin do, except where it's really repetitive. Who would really want to look through all the photos on Facebook? I'm a neuroscientist by training, nosotros have this term 'promiscuous.' Heart movements are promiscuous considering they don't cost me very much. I can await around actually easily, whereas working around and touching everything, that'southward costly. We fabricated sourcing promiscuous. Nosotros can consider when a company hired Guild they essentially were considering i of 122 million people for every job they had.

Costa: Yeah, it's applying the scale. It'southward human judgment, but applied at scale which opens up all sorts of opportunity.

Ming: I think that's where we came on the console as a determination and where all of my experience in this domain has taken me is nosotros need to redefine AI from artificial intelligence to augmented intelligence. You demand to build complementary tools that practice what humans really don't want to or can't do well vastly better. In some cases these are high-value jobs like radiology, but who wants to exist the get-go person to die from a cancer that an AI could have diagnosed? Instead, y'all desire to continue a human being on the job.

Right now AIs can't manage the whole human feel of healthcare. Having an AI-powered GP who I could go in in 1 visit, take every exam effectively done by that md correct there and and so together we can brand a decision on my handling program, that would be an amazing feel.

I'thousand skeptical whether that experience is going to be delivered, but that's the value proposition of AI.

Costa: I of the interesting stories when Watson came out and Deep Blue and it started competing in chess competitions. It finally beat the human chess masters, but then in that location was another wave of experimentation where a chess master paired with a computer could actually practise fifty-fifty better than either one alone, which I thought was a dandy story and perchance a pathway forward.

Ming: This has been done in healthcare as well. In the specific case of epidemiological diagnostics, what they plant is the best combination was essentially the dr. every bit another input to the AI, only the AI did make the final decision. Now I think treatments, those are cut and dry out. Does this person have this disease or not? When you lot aggrandize that to then 'how do we treat it?', what does that mean for someone who's young and single versus older with a large family. That's something that we don't have AI to deal with correct now. That is not a i-second judgment.

Costa: Right.

Ming: There truly is power. I don't think people should exist bent over in fields picking strawberries. I don't think [miners] should have to go a mile under the ground to mine coal. We can build systems to do that. I don't mean I tin imagine. People are building those technologies right now. They can be deployed and they are meliorate, more efficient, and less costly than a human solution. Then we got to think, what am I going to do with all of those people?

Costa: Yep, that was my next question which is that we're both techno-optimists, I call back, simply people ask, 'aren't all these people going to lose their jobs?' I tell them yeah, if you're driving a vehicle on American roads right now y'all may non take a job in 25 years, yous may non accept a job in 10 years.

Ming: Yeah, and it goes bigger than that. One of the misconceptions among some very smart people, Jared Bernstein recently had an article saying at present look, in that location haven't been any productivity gains in the US economy, and so it tin can't be automation equally a more general discussion of AI. Information technology was a well thought out piece, but his core assumption was automation, it volition only happen at the low stop. We're talking about automating factory work, automating agriculture. Actually we're going to meet this automation and this deportation top to bottom.

That's part of what I actually … I'one thousand genuinely optimistic virtually what AI can do. I build it, I have built systems for diabetes and for bipolar disorder, for finding jobs, for pedagogy. I'grand truly hooked, I am part of the trouble. Did I believe in its potential, does it brand the other problems become away? We tend to piece of work under this very optimistic supposition that yeah, people are going to lose jobs and they're going to be financial analysts and farm workers and doctors and long-haul truckers.

Costa: Writers, unfortunately.

Ming: The majority of articles written today are written past narrative scientific discipline and a spinoff of writers. It's non very interesting, writing, simply it does look like someone wrote it.

Costa: It communicates the facts and if that's all that y'all're doing then that is not a sustainable career. You have to accept value.

Ming: I have this notorious quote now that if you lot're doing the aforementioned job today you were doing a week ago someone like me is going to come up forth and automate that chore.

Costa: It'due south making you very popular.

Ming: Yep, simply the thing is, the reason why I'm neither a pessimist nor a utopianist is considering I think in that location are things we can do to change the direction of this story. Permit'south have a very specific case that I brought up during the session. Some friends of mine have a startup called Pacific Labs. Information technology's actually cool, their original vision which they've moved slightly away from is hardware. It's like a wand, a sonogram with built-in AI, deep neural networks right there. You run it over you and information technology's doing diagnostics in existent time as it's running over you.

Costa: It's a tri-quarter.

Ming: Basically, yes. It'due south exactly that space and I think that is incredibly cool and in that location are two possibilities. 1 is I become meet my GP and they do that and they become all the information. They've mastered other tools. They really have a pretty practiced understanding of what's going on inside that wand, the tri-quarter. They know as much data scientific discipline as they do biological science and so nosotros together come up up with this handling program.

The flip side is essentially I go to Jiffy Lube and a pair of legs carries that wand around. It feeds into a computer which spits out a treatment program and so that's it. There's no flexibility and at that place'due south no … The fashion I pose this is in i case we take 120 percent of the cost, just 200 percentage of the value. In another case we just have eighty pct of the value, merely it'southward simply 20 percent of the cost. Those kinds of labor cost differences make information technology hard for me to believe that we won't push towards the Jiffy Lube model. That's a real fear of mine is a massive downscaling. I think people volition have jobs, just they are not going to be jobs that people want. It's going to be sophisticated versions of the service manufacture, opening the door for people, running an AI and and then sending them on their way.

The vision that AI volition allow creative people to do astonishing things and solve new bug that have never been addressable before is legitimate. It's not going to magically happen because what that story misses isn't the AI, it misses the human. This is the elementary truth that we aren't building people if you don't listen that metaphor. We aren't edifice people to exist creative problem solvers, to be adaptive. We're building them to pull levers, sometimes very complex, cerebral levers, but nonetheless it'due south lever pulling. Those people are not going to be fix for an AI-enabled job.

Costa: I liken it to we had these transformations in the economy before, nosotros had the Industrial Revolution. Nosotros've lost all those farming jobs. The number, we used to utilize 80 percent of the population to feed ourselves and now we get by with, I don't know, less than 10.

Ming: Yes, it's tiny although in some places such equally in Sub-Saharan Africa it's a massive part of the economy.

Costa: Equally we make this transition we're going to need a similar type of restructuring to deal with this automation revolution.

Ming: I'g going to go a little political. I'm going to say …

Costa: Go for information technology.

Ming: … at that place is a big dissever between people that meet the world as fundamentally dynamic and uncertain and people that see the world every bit static and actually have moral associations with them. For someone like me, a scientist, a West Coaster and and so forth, to me it's like, wow, if my startup doesn't piece of work information technology'south my fault. I need to adapt, I need to alter, I demand to gear up things. I think in a lot of places they encounter … Look, this isn't right. Why are there no coal-mining jobs? The idea that nosotros don't need them anymore is just not part of that moral equation. It is wrong that these take disappeared.

The reason I bring information technology upwards in this AI discussion is I recall these are actually very general human being phenomenon. We can talk almost globalization, AI, automation in general. They'd all have the same story backside them which is I don't need you anymore, non what you're currently bringing, but they all brought wonderful things also in some sense. Fifty-fifty globalization which people tend to await at scan prepare gets me a $10 shirt which I could not get out of an American worker. If I'm non willing to pay more $10 I shouldn't be then upset that my neighbour doesn't have a job anymore.

These are genuine, complex problems that I think have solutions, but they're solutions nosotros accept to actively decide to take a footstep towards. We need craftsmen, we don't demand tools with just legs carrying them around. We need adaptive, creative trouble solvers that can then take these amazing technologies and do something amazingly creative with them.

Costa: How do we become to that betoken where in that location's going to exist a creative form that specializes in this on the coasts, but how practice we … What steps do we demand to have in order to … so that we tin can have a workforce that is gainfully employed and working in ways that support themselves.

Ming: One affair nosotros need to do is motion education away from the tool side of the equation. Tools being all the skills and cognition that I can give yous a test and say exercise you lot know how to do this. It's really my ability to understand you lot, to control my emotion, to assess how the rest of my day will become. Those are the things that … Here'southward a big who knew. Those were the things that have always been predictive of life outcomes. AI is but accelerating this process. Nosotros volition still need equally yous call it this artistic class. Nosotros volition need research engineers and we will need enquiry doctors and artists and all sorts of people whose chore is explicitly to push button into the unknown considering if they're non pushing into the unknown why aren't we automating it?

I think the problem … Let me put it this way, if you were thinking about structuring your company for the time to come you've got 2 solutions. First thinking about how hard it is to compete for top talent right now and then imagine that that's the simply talent you will need. What is that going to do to the scorched earth talent markets that are out at that place today? It's bad in Silicon Valley, but await till this comes onboard where that minimal scale level if yous will, minimum craftsmanship goes up and up and up.

That's one side. If we don't bargain with figuring out how to [inaudible 00:17:08] anybody else a craftsman, how to increase the size of the artistic class then information technology will go a crazy competition for talent, but the flip side is how do we actually do this and it's stop teaching the tools. Why are we education programming in classes now? Believe me, I honey math, I dearest programming. In terms of the cognitive impacts I call back about the earth fundamentally differently considering I'yard the kind of person that uses orthogonal in casual conversation. It changes how I remember nigh the world to know something about these things.

There'southward an implicit promise, hey, if you learn how to plan in high school ten years from now there'south going to be a programming chore that pays $120,000 a year. No, at that place won't be. I don't think there'll be such jobs for anybody because again I've got some friends that are building a deep neural network that can program apps from scratch. Information technology may non exist a mature engineering science yet, simply boy, it will exist by the time those people hit the job marketplace.

Nosotros need to stop with the focus on tools and retrieve how exercise nosotros build people that take strong cerebral skills, strong trouble solving, metacognition, social and emotional intelligence. These are the things that are actually valuable. Then information technology turns out one time I have those, in one case I've got a bunch of craftsmen I can actually teach you all sorts of tools and then augment it by AIs that can quickly and adaptively change.

Ane day I'1000 doing this test, I am an engineer and I have an AI that can quickly debug my programme and that seems powerful today. Well, three years from now I don't need to be writing programs anymore. Something I've learned near how to solve problems in programmatic means is even so actually useful. At present essentially I'thou like a program managing director directing a bunch of AIs to create programs. I understand trouble solving, I sympathise how these programs are supposed to make the world better for my customers. I tin can't practice that retraining with someone that isn't a craftsman.

Costa: Where do we start because I retrieve that when you look at the educational system in the U.S. it is about tools. We're not teaching typing anymore, we're education programming and we remember that's a huge step up and it is in a lot of means, but it's still tool-driven and I recollect in part because we can measure that.

Ming: Oh, yeah, that'south a large part of information technology. We tin say another thing and this is a bit of an aside. I think ane of the reasons why VR and AI is so big so pop hither and this is someone who appreciates both of them is because it's a whole bunch of new products that we can sell. Information technology's not … I'grand displacing the telly and selling a whole new line of product and the AI, my God, IBM and GE and Amazon and Google they desire to own that platform. They're not talking most that, but of form they exercise. That is huge to ain an AI behind everything, and so that's a footling flake of an bated.

What do we do with people? I practise a lot of focus on families. There's this wonderful work, a guy named Heckman at the Academy of Chicago, a Nobel Prize winner. He but released a report. He looked at what happened if y'all did loftier-quality childcare starting at eight weeks through five years of age. You lot may not think this has anything to do with AI, but recall I want a world of augmented intelligence, non artificial.

What he found was … He then tracked those kids to historic period xxx, a profound change in their life outcomes. These were poor, single moms. It was transformative for them, it was transformative for the kids. His estimate was … The return on the investment was 14 percent every year. I wrote an op-ed really virtually a year and a half ago maxim if kids were bonds they'd be the courage of the earth economy. They render better than whatever financial musical instrument out at that place.

Costa: That started with Head Start. Experimenting and now yous're going all the way back to eight weeks and you still encounter returns.

Ming: The cognitive is largely prepare by ages say 5 to eight. If you don't arbitrate then, that's it. All of the raw cerebral ability of a kid is pretty much fixed. There's some bang-up recent papers on that that we can continue and on, at to the lowest degree I could. Your chance to go in and intervene and so … Then once you've made a alter at that place in a child being able to go to the adjacent stage if you want to call back of it this way and focus on their emotional development and so their social development and and so the metacognitive. We do all … Not the cognitive, everything else nosotros do throughout the entirety of our lives.

Here'southward the exciting point. Not only am I talking nigh preparing kids to actually be making use of these amazing new technologies, only these amazing new technologies can then close the loop and fix the kids for them. Of course, that's a lot of what I exercise at my company, merely we're not the only ones. To think almost what information technology means for substantially these artificial systems to say let's create the kind of person that will do amazing things with me and these are long-term …

One of the reasons this doesn't need to be, merely is largely in the easily of government is just because we're talking about a xx or 30-year investment before it starts paying off. Boy, do I wish companies would start stepping up and saying, you know what, this is in our cocky-interest. We need this technology, we need this talent and we've actually constitute that productivity inside of companies actually increases when y'all provide these things. Not from the kids because you brand it like shooting fish in a barrel to exist a parent, people bring more to the job.

I don't want to downplay it. I am concerned well-nigh AI's touch on in the ways I'm concerned near global warming. I'm not concerned nearly big, evil AIs taking over the world. I think that's a bit farcical, but the social stress and incertitude that comes from this deportation, quite bluntly, I remember we already are seeing in the elections. Not just here, but effectually the western world and male child, you think it'due south bad here, expect till this starts to play out at real scale here, Africa, Asia, massive numbers of people with nothing but time on their hands which I don't think anybody wants.

Costa: No, information technology'due south a formula for … We've seen what happens when specially young men have likewise much time on their hands and not a lot of prospects, so is that the … Is at that place anything that y'all are particularly afraid of in terms of the hereafter? At that place are a lot of people that are only afraid of the future in general, simply what concerns you nearly in terms of …

Ming: I've got this weird dualistic affair, I love the technology. Nosotros accept to build information technology. I am involved in a projection to predict manic episodes in bipolar sufferers, simply it changed their life. 20-v percent of those people go along to kill themselves when they have severe attacks and yous can intervene on that and prevent that from happening. You tin imagine the same matter in major depression, early predictions of Alzheimer's or Autism at the 2 ends of the scale. You have to do those. Those are moral good.

Why should people die in car accidents, why should people have cancers that go undiagnosed? AI tin be amazing, but nosotros can't lose focus on the social institutions, the cultural institutions that need to evolve along with them. My real business concern is we encounter a world where essentially AI is only used to reduce labor costs downwards to nothing. All of the revenue, information technology's not and so different than some of the things nosotros're seeing already.

This is a wonderful story for Jeff and Larry and Mark and these other people that stand up to benefit quite directly from this. Everyone else bereft of a purpose, bereft of a sense of control over their life, I don't think that a universal living wage solves that problem, nor do I think 20 years from now a bunch of [inaudible 00:25:40] wealthy people are going to be and then excited virtually paying everyone else to do nothing. I'grand genuinely concerned most non social costs in a soft way.

I've said this frequently, so I'll say information technology again, acknowledging that it'southward a bit hyperbolic, but the 2 social institutions in Africa that will benefit the virtually from massive deportation are Al-Shabaab and Boko Haram. This isn't a argument about religion. This is just guys with time on their hands looking for a purpose. They will find information technology hither in the worst possible ways, they'll find it there, they'll find it everywhere. We demand to build people that can create that purpose for themselves. Those are the kinds of people that are going to flourish in this new world.

Costa: You said a universal minimum wage wouldn't solve all the problems, but could it be role of the solution? Do y'all think information technology should be part of the solution?

Ming: It certainly could exist. Listen, I'1000 adequately progressive in my politics although I'm very much a testify to me that information technology works person. I don't retrieve people should … Permit'south take the idealized version. I don't recollect people should non be able to be doctors only because they don't accept enough to eat or they need to take a crummy task out of med schoolhouse and take a crummy job because they got to pay their hire or take care of a ill relative. Aye, admittedly. That release from want … Part of the moral adept of AI is …

I take this friend who congenital a robot. It tin can walk through fields and visually distinguish the crops from the weeds. Impale the weeds with millimeter precision fertilizer spray, conventional [inaudible 00:27:24], organic farming, faster, more than efficient than humans can practice information technology. That is a moral skillful, but what do you do with all the subcontract workers. I retrieve I accept some pretty legitimate fears, but hither'southward the heady office. Different the global warming scenario where this is all nigh mitigating a terrible catastrophe that might be in our future, my might has a very frail way of putting that.

In this case there's an upside, there'southward a massive upside. If we just took the world right now today and created a globe, maybe not everyone's part of the creative class, not everyone's a craftsman, but right now I'm simply going to brand up a number, it's 1%. What if it were x%, what if information technology was 20? That would exist transformative.

Costa: Yep, and what a lot of people don't realize virtually all these companies is Facebook is huge, Microsoft'southward very large, but there are orders of magnitude smaller than the industrial giants, that we're actually edifice things and shipping things. There's great innovation, at that place's great wealth that's being generated, but there'south not the same levels of employment.

Ming: I have to be honest, I prefer to use in my example Hipmunk, simply in using Hipmunk I'm effectively putting … This has already happened, putting travel agents out of business. Now what'due south really gone on at that place isn't that Hipmunk provides me a better service. In some ways if I could take afforded a travel agent it's performing a worse service. I'one thousand not denigrating them, but it's that exact instance. It's lxxx% of the value, only boy, it's not fifty-fifty 20 percent of the cost. It's a tiny fraction of a percent of the cost. Why wouldn't I do that? I'm too wildly antisocial and misanthropic, then then I don't fifty-fifty take to interact with people, wonderful.

Costa: I hate talking on the phone.

Ming: Yeah.

Costa: Oh, God, delight don't call me.

Ming: No, simply this is the nature of the tradeoff which is they've pushed the margins of that industry downwardly to thin, sparse layers where at that place'south really merely plenty of a marketplace for v to 6 players to have a meaningful revenue stream. They've done it by forcing all the people out. Everyone likes to say hey, that's wonderful. Who wants to be a travel agent? Wouldn't you similar to do something creative? Well, sure, if that creative thing actually pays my rent. If I oasis't actually committed my life to being a pretty decent travel agent, pull that complex, cognitive lever every 24-hour interval and at present of a sudden I'm supposed to retrain and get something completely unlike and have a similar bacon in life.

No, we're not going to get the same salary. I'1000 going to get eighty per centum of that salary. The next time that transition happens I'grand going to get 80 percentage of that salary. We have a massive downscaling, a tightening of … I'm non pounding on my fists like Bernie Sanders here, but a real tightening of the economy with respect to everyone doing the labor. That's where I think nosotros go the true overpromise of AI right now. Isn't can it diagnose cancer or can it drive a car, the truthful overpromise of AI right now is no thing what happens nosotros will all be improve off. I think that's actually naïve.

Costa: It depends who we … defining who we are.

Ming: Of grade, the people making these statements are some of my young man panelists who have a pretty invested interest in …

Costa: They volition be ameliorate off.

Ming: … everyone believing that story. They will be better off. Mark and Larry and all of them will be better off. Will I? Probably. Will my kids? Male child, I don't know. Will 99 percent of the global population? Information technology's hard for … Practise y'all call up they … Hither'southward the centre of this story. If people were only waiting to be freed of the burdens of labor, to go be scientists and artists, judge what, they'd already exist doing it. Y'all don't go paid much if annihilation to be either of those. It'southward not like people are passing up on being artists because they couldn't go to the right school or something like that. Information technology's because at that place's no indicate in making that endeavor in your life if you don't think it'southward going to pay off. I'd honey for AI to be and this is the augmented kind, to be that transformative engineering that truly makes people's lives pay off, only it won't happen by magic.

Costa: Aye, and I don't see whatever organized response from any of our institutions. I call back we're merely starting to wrap our minds effectually the trouble and it'southward starting to sink in that this is happening, merely there's really no organized response. I don't know where that response would come from.

Ming: I recall the White House noted some concerns in their recent written report. Accenture had a report, McKinsey. They all acknowledged the problems. So they say but, of course, during the industrial revolution, yada, yada, yada. We could get into that story if you want to, only is a story from 200 years ago, is that actually the best story we've got? My response to that is yeah, merely then you lot had a generation to recover and retrain.

Now information technology's I don't need your job anymore, become retrain in six weeks and even past the time you come out 6 weeks afterward the job y'all retrained for, I don't need you anymore. As I say people similar me are building new AIs on the order of every two years, coming upward with new, actually conceptually different, disruptive AIs. It takes me 20 years to build a person. That is not math that is in the favor of social stability if we are not actively dealing with the problem.

Costa: Vivienne, it's a slap-up conversation. How can people follow y'all online, find out more about your work?

Ming: I have a couple of books coming out. One is called How to Robot-Proof Your Kids and the other is The Tax On Beingness Different. Follow me @NeuralTheory, and yous'll come across when all those release dates are. If yous want to acquire more nigh our educational applied science visit SocosLearning.com.

For more Fast Frontward with Dan Costa, subscribe to the podcast. On iOS, download Apple tree's Podcasts app, search for "Fast Forward" and subscribe. On Android, download the Stitcher Radio for Podcasts app via Google Play. For those without a mobile device, listen via the sound file below.